On 24 January 2012, the Court of Appeal handed down its keenly awaited decision in West Tankers Inc v Allianz SPA & Generali Assicurazione Generali SPA [2012] EWCA Civ 27.
Tel: 01702 339222
Legal news
On 24 January 2012, the Court of Appeal handed down its keenly awaited decision in West Tankers Inc v Allianz SPA & Generali Assicurazione Generali SPA [2012] EWCA Civ 27.
On 20 December 2011 the National Health Service (Right to Treatment) Bill proposed by Hugh Bayley MP was given its first reading in the House of Commons.
The recent UK case of AstraZeneca UK Limited v International Business Machines Corporation [2011] EWHC 306 (TCC) concerned a dispute relating to the exit provisions in a Master Services Agreement (MSA) for IT infrastructure services between IBM and AstraZeneca.
From April this year there will be dramatic reductions in civil court opening hours, not for hearings but for face-to-face counter services.
The European Court of Human Rights has recently delivered judgment confirming that the construction of liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) terminals in Milford Haven, South Wales did not breach the human rights of local residents.
A public discussion will be launched later this year by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority to gauge public opinion on whether a new scientific procedure should be introduced.
In Lumb v Hampsey [2011] the court considered how it should exercise its discretion under CPR 36.10(5) when assessing the costs consequences of late acceptance of a Part 36 offer.
A recent study in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine reveals that patients admitted to hospital on Sundays are 16% more likely to die than patients admitted mid-week.
The BBC recently reported on the sad case of a 19 year old UK serviceman, home on leave, who was killed after being struck by a car on an unlit road in the early hours of Christmas Day.
In the General Dental Council v Rimmer [2011] EWHC 3438 (Admin) the General Dental Council Professional Conduct Committee’s fi nding of misconduct was quashed because the Committee did not indicate a clear determination as to the expert evidence which they preferred.
The Supreme Court has found that Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights does impose an operational obligation on states to protect mentally ill patients who are not detained under the Mental Health Act 1983, where they are at a real and immediate risk of suicide.
In the UK case of AMP vs Persons Unknown, [2011] EWHC 3454 (TCC), an unnamed British woman (AMP) has obtained an injunction to prevent anyone from distributing explicit images of her on the internet, including by using bittorrent technology.
In the recent case of Ravat v Halliburton Manufacturing and Services Ltd, the Supreme Court held that an employee who was employed by a German company, and who was working in Libya at the time of his dismissal, was entitled to bring an unfair dismissal claim in Great Britain.
Former UK cabinet minister Chris Huhne and his ex-wife Vicky Pryce both appeared in court last week to face charges of attempting to pervert the course of justice.
This week the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed an appeal from the Court of Appeal in the case of Sugar v BBC.
Religious beliefs have again clashed with gay rights in the recent Court of Appeal case Bull & Bull v Hall & Preddy.
Mr Justice Tugendhat has today handed down a short judgment explaining why he made an interlocutory order to prevent the publication of private and confidential information about Jacqueline Gold, the high-profile Chief Executive of Ann Summers.
Following a challenge brought by a number of unions, the High Court ruled in December 2011 that the Government had acted lawfully in deciding to increase public sector pensions in line with the Consumer Prices Index (“CPI”) rather than the Retail Prices Index (“RPI”).
An interesting judgement was handed down in the United Kingdom’s (UK) First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) recently in the case of Bluesparkle Limited v The Commissioner for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2012] UKFTT 45 (TC).
In the recent case of James v Gina Shoes Ltd and others UKEAT/0384/11 the EAT has given consideration to the issue of whether negative remarks which were made by a managing director to an employee regarding his age gave rise to a ‘prima facie’ case of discrimination.
As bonus time looms for many employers, and especially those in the Square Mile, employees start casting around for alternative options in case their variable remuneration doesn't meet their expectations - or living costs.
It has been almost a year since the Tests-Achats ruling was made by the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”).
A recent Inner House decision may provide some comfort to planning authorities grappling with the new appeal requirements post planning reform.
The Tax Administration Bill (TAB) will soon be signed into law as the Tax Administration Act (TAA).
In the recent case of Ravat v Halliburton Manufacturing and Services Ltd the Supreme Court confirmed that whether an employee is entitled to the right not to be unfairly dismissed depends on whether Great Britain is the place with which, in comparison with any other, their employment has the clos
This article considers the case law relating to “bumping” and provides practical suggestions for employers.
The son of Caroline Spelman, the Environment Secretary, has obtained an injunction against the publishers of the Daily Star Sunday.
A recent decision could form the basis of an appeal challenging the concept of 'establishment' for the purposes of the collective redundancy threshold.
We recently wrote about the case of Martin Lavin whose hand was apparently 'guided' into signing his Will by his sister, Anne.
A recent survey by Nuffield Health has found that more people are now inclined to go to work sick.
In the recent case of Scottish Sea Farms Ltd and Logan Inglis Ltd v Her Majesty’s Advocate, two companies appealed to the High Court of Justiciary seeking to have fines (imposed as a result of health & safety breaches) reduced.
The Court of Appeal has ruled on a case involving reasonable adjustments in examinations leading to qualification as a solicitor (the Legal Practice Course - LPC).
The Supreme Court has held that an employee who carried out all his work outside the UK could nevertheless bring a claim of unfair dismissal in a UK employment tribunal because his employment had a “substantial connection” to the UK (Ravat v Halliburton Manufacturing and Services Limited [2012] U
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has ruled that weeding out the most expensive applicants for an over-subscribed voluntary severance scheme was lawful despite its disproportionate impact on employees in the 50-54 age bracket.
On 8 February 2012, the Court of Appeal published an order allowing Interclass to appeal against the revised penalty imposed on it by the Competition Appeal Tribunal (“CAT”).
In Sulamerica CIA Nacional de Seguros SA & Ors v Enesa Engenharia SA & Ors [2012] EWHC 42 (Comm), Mr Justice Cooke held that an anti-suit injunction restraining the defendant insureds from pursuing proceedings in Brazil in breach of an arbitration clause would be continued.
On 9 February 2012, the OFT announced that it had closed its abuse of dominance investigation in relation to equipment supplied to the NHS.
In the recent High Court case of Patel v Unite the court granted an order for an independent IT expert to inspect the respondent's computer systems after the respondent failed to comply fully with a Norwich Pharmacal order.
The Claimant, who was seven at the time of the accident, was crossing a road (known as Acregate Lane) with her mother and aunt when she was struck by a Range Rover vehicle driven by Mr. Brady, sustaining serious head, thoracic, abdominal and pelvic injuries as a consequence.
The Claimant lived within the defendant local authority area.
Section 151(8) Road Traffic Act 1988 does not constitute exclusion from compulsory insurance cover.
The Court of Appeal decided two separate appeals that concerned the circumstances in which an employer company would be liable for the tort committed by its employee.
In the recent case of Jessemey v Rowstock Ltd and another ET/2700838/11 and ET/2701156/11 the tribunal held that the victimisation suffered by an employee, after his employment had terminated, was not unlawful under the Equality Act 2010.
Railcare Ltd were fined £133,000 at Glasgow Sheriff Court on 8 February 2012 for a breach of Section 2 of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974.
In 2011, a number of banking and financial transaction disputes were considered by the courts in the UK.
A nasty surprise (it is reported) has just popped through the letterbox at Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust.
The recently published Building the NHS Trust Development Authority sets out how the authority will provide governance and support for trusts moving towards foundation status by April 2014.
In considering whether the claimant had brought her unfair dismissal claim in time, the EAT in Chelmsford College Corporation v Teal decided that a unilateral resignation had been withdrawn with the consent of the employer and the employment continued until a further unilateral resignation was ac
The Commission on Assisted Dying, established in 2010 by the interest group Dignity in Dying was funded by author Sir Terry Pratchett, who has Alzheimer's.
The existing legal right for staff to raise concerns about safety, malpractice or other wrong doing without suffering any detriment is to be highlighted in the NHS Constitution.
In a potential redundancy situation where the employer has made a suitable offer of alternative employment and a reasonable employee would accept this, an employee cannot reasonably turn down the offer, right?
A number of recent cases have re-emphasised that the scheme in the Medical Act 1983 for interim suspension or interim conditions on practice may not be relied upon indefinitely, regardless of concerns about protection of the public, the practitioner, or the public interest, if fitness to practise
The recent Court of Appeal decision in R (on the application of Dritan Krasniqi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department sets out the current position in relation to damages for unlawful detention.
R (on the application of Marcus) v NMC concerned allegations relating to a single clinical incident against a registered nurse who was alleged to have failed to provide appropriate assistance to a doctor looking after a premature baby.
This was the decision of the court in R (on the application of TA) v North East London NHS.
The NHS Commissioning Board released various documents, ahead of its second board meeting which was held on Thursday 2 February.
On 22 December 2011, the DH issued new guidance on the role of healthcare organisations in preventing terrorism, entitled Building Partnerships, Playing Safe.
Employers can apply to court for a "springboard" injunction to prevent employees from taking advantage of breaches of confidentiality duties, typically in team move cases.
The Danish Council Presidency last week reached an agreement with representatives of the European Parliament on the proposed Regulation on market infrastructures, over-the-counter (OTC) derivative transactions, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR).
John Barrie and Jenny Grant, Partners with Morton Fraser and both experts in Personal Injury, Litigation & Dispute Resolution, discuss the recent breast implant scare and who, if anyone, is liable.
Employees can generally make unfair dismissal claims in the UK only if they are working in Great Britain at the date of dismissal.
As reported elsewhere in this update, the IMCA service created by the Mental Capacity Act 2005 to safeguard people who lack capacity to make certain decisions, commenced on 1 April 2007 and in December 2011 the fourth annual report was published.
As from 6 February, the rules relating to the FSA's executive settlement procedures under Chapter 5 of the FSA's Decision Procedure and Penalties Manual changed.
Following a decision of the High Court of England and Wales in Armstrong DLW GmbH v Winnington Network Ltd [2012] EWHC 10 (Ch) the legal status of European Union Allowances (EUAs) traded under the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS), has now been clarified, with the Court holding that EUAs shoul
The Secretary of State for Health and the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills have asked the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority to lead a public consultation on the question of whether the law should be changed to allow current research techniques, for the prevention
In M v GMC, Dr Martin appealed against the findings of a Fitness to Practise Panel of the GMC, which erased him for impaired fitness to practise by reason of misconduct.
Parliament is proposing to increase the maximum amount an employment Tribunal can require by way of a deposit order, from the current £500 to £1,000.
In the case of Crilly v Ballymagroarty Hazelbank Community Partnership, an Industrial Tribunal in Northern Ireland found that an essential requirement in a job advertisement indirectly discriminated against women.
In the wake of the organisational changes introduced by the Health and Social Care Bill, Information Governance for Transition provides the latest NIGB guidance on data handling.
For an interim period of one year from April 2012 to 31 March 2013, the National Clinical Assessment Service will be hosted by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
The DH has issued new guidance to NHS trusts on sharing information about debts which overseas visitors owe for NHS treatment.
On 10 January, the NHS Future Forum published its second set of reports to Health Secretary Andrew Lansley, which cover integration, education and training, information and the role of the NHS in public health.
What is the best way to protect the authority of international commercial arbitrations?
The Information Commissioner has recently issued guidance setting out his view that the Freedom of Information Act 2000 "applies to official information held in private email accounts (and other media formats) when held on behalf of the public authority".
Recent cases provide useful guidance on consultation requirements in the context of budget cuts and the new equality legislation.
The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (TUPE) saw an extension of the previous TUPE regulations (the 1981 Regulations) to include service provision changes within their ambit.
In the matter of the General Dental Council v Savery & Ors, the GDC sought a declaration that it may disclose internally confidential clinical records (already in their possession) of 14 patients, without their consent.
The European Court of Justice, in the case of Kucuk v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, has considered the validity of a series of fixed-term employment contracts.
It is rare for an English court to be asked to determine an account of profits in an IP infringement action.
It had been thought that the principles relating to the application of natural justice to adjudicators’ decisions were well settled and that adjudicators would apply them.
Since the publication of the Health and Social Care Bill, a key plank of which is the abolition of primary care trusts, those with an interest in the PCT estate have been ruminating over the question of the future of such estate.
In Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Shaw, the EAT considered when aggravated damages should be awarded, and their relationship with awards for injury to feelings.
In DB Schenker Rail (UK) Ltd v Doolan, the Scottish EAT held that an employment tribunal wrongly decided that the employer was not entitled to conclude, on the basis of expert evidence, that an employee was unfit to return to work.
The Court of Appeal recently considered a case where a husband and wife each mistakenly signed the others will instead of signing their own.
The EAT has held in another incapability case that an employment tribunal was wrong to require that an employer should have taken length of service into account, and to require that it should have followed a particular procedure when obtaining further medical evidence.
Siobhan Jones recounts the rise (& fall) of the "protester squatter".
In Dunn v Institute of Cemetery and Crematorium Management, the EAT has held that discrimination by reason of ‘marital status’ can include less favourable treatment because an employee is married to a particular person, rather than just because that employee is married.
The Supreme Court has held that employees cannot recover damages for loss suffered as a result of a breach of a term in their employment contract as to the manner of their dismissal, unless that loss is independent of the dismissal.
On 3 February 2012, the English High Court (Kitchin LJ) handed down its judgment in the case of Football Association Premier League Ltd and Others v QC Leisure and Others [2012] EWHC 108 (Ch).
On 3 February, the High Court issued its judgment in the long-running, and closely followed, copyright infringement action by the English Football Association Premier League (FAPL) against importers of foreign satellite decoders and a representative sample of UK publicans.
The Court of Session’s decision on the long-running “Moonzie” case was delivered yesterday, overturning the Land Court’s decision of June 2010.
In an extension of human rights law, the Supreme Court has made it clear that all psychiatric patients admitted into a mental health unit and at risk of suicide should be given the same level of protection irrespective of their status under the Mental Health Act.
In Enterprise Management Services Ltd v Connect-Up Ltd & Others, the EAT confirmed that there was no service provision change for the purposes of TUPE where the activities of an outgoing contractor (Enterprise) were not fundamentally the same as those of the incoming contractor (Connect), and
Regulation 7 of TUPE states that a dismissal will be automatically unfair if the main reason for dismissal is the transfer itself, or a reason connected with the transfer that is not an economic, technical or organisational reason entailing changes in the workforce (‘ETO reason’).
The maximum compensation that the Employment Tribunal can award for unfair dismissal (save in exceptional cases) and the basis upon which statutory redundancy payments are calculated will increase from 1 February 2012
2011 saw many important legal developments in the area of business finance and insolvency law both internationally as well as in Singapore.
A supermarket scuffle has led the English Court of Appeal to reject the argument that the plaintiff’s contributory negligence could serve as a defence to a claim for assault and battery: Pritchard v Co-operative Group (GWS) Ltd, [2011] EWCA Civ 329.
The UKSC and the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council have announced that counsel on any given appeal before these two courts may, if they all agree, dispense with wigs and gowns.
In Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge, the House of Lords reviewed the law on undue influence in relation to individuals giving security for their spouse's debts.
Outer House case considering the interpretation of missives for a property in Melrose.
JSC BTA Bank (controlled, since entering receivership, by the government of Kazakhstan) sought to recover $1.8 billion in assets allegedly misappropriated by Mukhtar Ablyazov during his tenure as chairman of the bank.
Court of Appeal finds in favour of Claimant who slipped on a plastic icicle in Santa’s grotto; although the Defendant had a good system of inspection, the icicle was there to be seen.
Employees who live in Britain and commute to work abroad may have unfair dismissal rights in Britain, particularly if the employment contract is governed by British employment law and the employee has been reassured that he will retain British employment law rights.
In the recent case of McCain Foods (GB) Limited v Eco-Tec (Europe) Limited [2011], the Court awarded McCain (who were represented by Eversheds) almost £2m for breach of contract relating to a defective gas scrubbing system.
Lord Judge (real name), Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, has issued guidance stating that representatives of the media and ‘legal commentators’ may send live, text-based messages from court without having to seek permission (subject to the possibility that their blogging or tweeting might
Sean Delaney awoke from a nine-week coma to find himself severely injured as a result of a car accident, with ‘bleak’ prospects for future employment.
It’s difficult to determine whether we’ve reached the end of the PFI road in the UK or are simply about to embark on a new phase.
In the recent case of Arriva London South Ltd v Nicolaou, the Employment Appeal Tribunal considered the issue of whether it is a detriment in terms of s.45A of the Employment Rights Act (ERA) 1996 for an employee who chooses not to opt out of the 48-hour working week average limit provided for in
The increase to Employment Tribunal award limits was covered in our January E-Bulletin.
The Department for Business Innovation and Skills (“BIS”) has published a Strategy for UK Life Sciences which focuses on measures to boost both investment and innovation within the UK Life Sciences Industry.
Commercial contracts often contain clauses offering one or other party the first right to refusal in relation to some obligation, for example the right to obtain a product or to supply a product.
Last year the Government announced that it was going to increase the qualifying period of service from one to two years before an employee could claim unfair dismissal.
The UK High Court in Porton Capital Technology Funds v 3M UK Holdings Ltd & 3M Company [2011] EWHC 2895 (Comm) recently considered the meaning of the phrase "which shall not be unreasonably withheld" in the context of a requirement to obtain a party's consent in a Share Purchase Agreement (SP
The Court of Appeal in England has ruled that Asda took unfair advantage of the reputation and prestige of Specsavers’ trade marks.
In these joint cases the majority of the Supreme Court held that breach of contract claims arising from an employer’s failure to follow an express contractual disciplinary process could not proceed if damages are claimed for the manner of the dismissal.
A recent case reminds both landlords and tenants that the interaction of break rights and other terms of a lease can sometimes produce unexpected results.
Joint service provider Enterprise Management Services took steps to improve productivity, efficient and costs when it became clear that its client was going to invite tenders for a single service provider.
Miss Bowling and Mr Thomas worked for the Prison Service.
Undue influence is a concept associated with abuses of trust and/or exploitation of the vulnerable.
Miss Hogg brought a claim for unfair dismissal arising out of her redundancy on the basis that some employees had been excluded and not all those who sought voluntary redundancy was made redundant.
Women are more likely to take time out from their careers than men because of childcare responsibilities.
Mr Sharp was employed by Dundee City Council for 35 years prior to his dismissal in September 2009 on grounds of capability.
Springboard injunctions were recently granted in favour of two employers in the cases of QBE Management Services (UK) Ltd v Dymoke and Others 2012 AER 156 and Clear Edge UK Ltd and Another v Elliot and Others 2011 EWHC 3376.
In Tiffin v Lester Aldridge LLP, the Court of Appeal has upheld the EAT and tribunal in deciding that a fixed-share partner was not an employee.
An employee is subject to the duty of fidelity, including the duty not to compete with his or her employer whilst the employment continues.
This appeal follows the first instance decision in 2010, where Asda was found not to have infringed Specsavers' logo trade mark (shown below) but only its word mark through the use of the strapline "Be a real spec saver at Asda" in Asda's promotion of its in-store optician service.
The High Court's judgment in Teesside Power Holdings Limited v Electrabel International Holdings B.V. GDF International SAS [2012] EWHC 33 (Comm) has recently been published.
In the first of 2 cases on a similar theme, we report this week on a decision of the High Court to grant a springboard injunction preventing three employees from joining a potential competitor on the basis of evidence that they had breached their duties of confidentiality and fidelity during thei
In a recent expedited judicial review (R (Friends of the Earth and Others) v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change), the Court decided that a mere proposal to reduce the amount payable to people with solar panels under the "Feed-In Tariffs" scheme was unlawful.
In Key2Law (Surrey) LLP v De'Antiquis, the Court of Appeal has approved the earlier EAT decision that administration proceedings are not capable of coming within the insolvency exception to the normal TUPE rule that on a business transfer the transferee takes over the employment obligations.
Are you a landowner?
We issued a briefing last month identifying a potential loophole in the statutory limit of 25 pupils for Primary 1 classes, which had the potential to make it very difficult for local authorities to comply with that limit in their most in-demand schools.
The Court of Appeal has issued further guidance on the thorny issue of the application of the TUPE Regulations to administration proceedings.
Friday the thirteenth, they say, is unlucky for some.
The end of 2011 was marked for the private healthcare market by the Office of Fair Trading's announcement of its provisional decision to refer the sector to the Competition Commission (CC) for investigation, and by public signs of tension between Bupa and BMI, the biggest private medical insurer
In the current climate of austerity, healthcare providers may be seeking ways to contain costs of treatment.